ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of a novel single-port robotic surgical system with flexible 3D endoscope and deformable surgical instruments in zero ischemic partial nephrectomy.Methods:From May 2021 to October 2021, a prospective study on patients with renal tumor who plan to receive zero ischemic partial nephrectomy was conducted. Inclusion criteria included over 18 years old, body index between 18.5 to 30.0 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score ranged from 1 to 3 points, cooperation with the follow-up and related examinations, voluntary in participating the clinical trial and signing the informed consent. Exclusion criteria included patients with other co-existed malignant tumors or a medical history of other malignant tumors, the patients who have received the same urological surgery in the past, the patients who underwent or plan to undergo other major operations 3 months before or after the surgery, the patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis or severe systemic diseases, the patients to be considered not suitable to enroll in by the researchers. A novel single-port robotic surgical system was used to perform the surgery. The system consiststed of a remote control console, a surgical equipment cart, a four-arm operation cart and deformable robotic instruments which were reusable. The two-section deformable robotic instruments were able to bend in four directions and carried different surgical instruments such as unipolar scissors, bipolar grasping forceps and needle holders. The deformable robotic instruments entered the body through a special trocar with single hole and multi-channel, and then unfolded in a triangle. By bending instruments, surgeons could perform single-port robotic surgery without the trouble of "chopstick effect" or "reverse direction" . Four cases of single-port partial nephrectomy were carried out. Under general anesthesia, the patients were taken the lateral recumbent position, with elevated waist and lowered head and feet. A 3-4 cm incision was taken layer by layer along the lateral edge of the rectus abdominis at the umbilicus level. A special 2.5 cm robotic trocar was set into the cavity, and a high-definition 3D laparoscopic lens and a snake shaped mechanical arm were then put into the abdominal cavity through the trocar. All operations were performed by transperitoneal approach with an auxiliary port through the same or a different skin incision if necessary. Tumor resection and renal reconstruction were performed by the way of zero ischemia. The perioperative parameters such as tumor size, operation time, intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications were analyzed.Results:Four patients were involved, including 2 males and 2 females, with 2 of them having a history of hypertension. The ECOG scores were all 0, and KPS score was 100 in 3 cases and 90 in 1 case. Preoperative mean serum creatinine was (76.8±18.8)μmol/L (range 70-104 μmol/L). The tumors were located on the left in 3 cases and on the right in 1 case. The diameter of the tumor ranged from 1.1 to 2.8 cm, with the TNM classification of T 1a. The R. E.N.A.L. scores were 4a, 7p, 6p and 4P respectively. The first operation was performed by pure single-port surgery, and the other 3 cases were performed with the help of an auxiliary port to ensure the safety .The operation time ranged from 155 min to 210 min, and the intraoperative bleeding ranged from 20 ml to 170 ml. Postoperative pathology showed 2 cases of renal clear cell carcinoma with negative margin and 2 cases of angiomyolipoma. No severe complications, such as bleeding or urinary leakage, were observed during the perioperative period, and the change of serum creatinine was insignificant before discharge and before operation( P=0.24). Conclusions:A robotic single-port partial nephrectomy can be successfully carried out by using this novel single-port robotic surgical system with flexible 3D endoscope and deformable surgical instruments.
ABSTRACT
There are few reports on the study of extraperitoneal robotic single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in China. In this study, patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with extraperitoneal robotic single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy extraperitoneal robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(EpRA-spRP)from April 2019 to June 2019.All patients performed EpRA-spRP successfully without adding additional auxiliary port. The operation time and blood loss were controllable, and hospitalization time was short. It is safe and feasible to perform EpRA-spRP for medium and low-risk prostate cancer. The short-term tumor control and functional recovery are satisfactory.However, the long-term effect needs further follow-up and observation.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To assess the safety and feasibility of single-port robotic radical cystectomy.Methods:During May 2019 and August 2019, nine patients (8 males, 1 female) received single-port robotic radical cystectomy by the same surgeon. The average age was 65.6(56-78)years. After a 4.5-5.5 cm trans-umbilical incision was made, Lagiport was inserted. Da Vinci Si system 1 #, 2 # arms and 30° lens were applied. Radical cystectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy were performed without additional ports. Urinary diversion was completed outside the body. Uterus and vaginal anterior walls were also resected for female patient. Results:All 9 surgeries were successfully conducted without additional ports or conversion to laparoscopic and open surgery. The average operation time was 437.8(280-600)min. Urinary diversion methods included 2 orthotopic ileal neobladder, 5 ideal conduit and 2 cutaneous ureterostomy. Average estimated blood loss was 227.8(100-450)ml, without blood transfusion. Average intestinal recovery time was 3.1(2-4)days, drainage duration was 8.3(3-16) days, and postoperative hospital stays was 7.7(6-13) days. Pathological TNM stage: T 2aN 0M 0 6 cases, T 2bN 0M 0 1 case, T 3aN 3M 0 1 case, T isN 0M 0 1 case. All surgical margins were negative. One bowel obstruction was cured with fasting and indwelling gastric tube. During 9-12 months’ follow-up, no tumor recurrence and metastasis were observed. There was no hydronephrosis or ureterostenosis. All surgical incision healed well. Conclusions:For experienced surgeons, single-port robotic radical cystectomy is safe and feasible with small incision and fast recovery. Short-term clinical result is satisfied.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the factors related to the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after bone metastasectomy and to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of renal cell carcinoma.Methods:The clinical data of 143 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in our center from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. Among 143 patients, 121 were male and 22 were female, with the average age of (54.8±12.5) year-old(from 18 to 85 year-old). The KPS scores of 138 patients were no higher than 80%. According to International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk model for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the patients were divided into intermediate risk group (92 patients) and poor risk group (51 patients). The patients who had received complete resection for both primary lesion and metastatic tumor were regarded as tumor-free (47 patients). Otherwise, the patients with unresectable primary tumor or incomplete resection of the metastatic tumor were defined as the patients surviving conversely bone metastases were the only metastatic site, and the other 57 patients also experienced concomitant metastases comparatively. Sixty-two patients only had solitary bone metastasis lesion and 81 patients had multiple bone metastases. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate. The impacts of different variables on the prognosis were examined by log-rank test. Univariate analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the independent risk factors.Results:The median follow-up time was 49.0 months. The overall survival was 1-115 months, with the median OS was 24.0 months. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate were 79.2%, 59.4% and 31.6%, respectively. All the patients underwent bone metastasectomy and 72 of them were treated with targeted therapy. The pathology results of metastasectomy were clear cell carcinoma for 132 patients and non-clear cell carcinoma for the 11 patients. In tumor-free group, the median OS was 30.0 months and in survival with tumor group, the median OS was 19.4 months, with a significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.030). In IMDC intermediate risk group, the prognosis was improved among the patients who received post-surgical targeted therapy after metastasectomy (24.3 months vs. 16.8 months, P=0.027), whereas the difference was not significant for IMDC poor risk group ( P=0.449). Age ≥60 years and multiple bone metastases sites were proved to be the independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after bone metastasectomy. Conclusions:The prognosis of RCC patients with bone metastases was generally poor. Metastasectomy could prolong the OS of the patients who had undergone primary nephrectomy and had solitary bone metastasis. Metastasectomy combined with targeted therapy could significantly improve the prognosis of the IMDC intermediate risk patients. However, the effect of targeted therapy among IMDC poor risk patients remained to be further proved.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the perioperative parameters and renal function in patients,whose aged was 65 year-old or above,with clinical T1-2 renal tumors undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN).Methods A retrospective review of 469 patients,who underwent RN and PN in our center,was conducted from January 2012 to November 2018,icluding 247 in the RN group and 222 in the PN group.The RN group consisted of 170 male and 77 female patients,with the mean age of (70.96 ± 5.21) year-old.126 cases were found that the tumor located on the fight side,with the median diameter of (4.93 ± 2.03) cm.The median BMI,median R.E.N.A.L.score and pre-operation eGFR of the RN group were (24.4 ± 3.1) kg/m2,8.39 ± 1.45) and (80.23 ± 15.14) ml/(min · 1.73 m2),respectively.The PN group consisted of 150 male and 72 female patients,with the mean age of (70.23 ± 4.62) years old.108 patients had tumors on the left side while 114 on the right side,with the median diameter of (3.17 ± 1.41) cm.The median BMI,median R.E.N.A.L score and pre-operation eGFR of the PN group were (23.5 ± 3.2) kg/m2,(6.69 ± 1.81) and (82.83 ± 14.36) ml/(min · 1.73m2),respectively.No statistical difference was noticed in the age,gender,tumor location and BMI between RN group and PN group(P ＞ 0.05).The PN group had smaller tumors and lower R.E.N.A.L.scores than the RN group (P ＜ 0.05).Various parameters were compared between the PN and RN groups,including operative duration,surgical procedure,intraoperative blood loss,perioperative blood transfusion,drainage tube removal time,postoperative duration of hospitalization,pathological results,the renal function immediately after surgery and at 1 month,1 year,2 years,3 years,4 years,5 years after surgery,and the incidence of chronic renal dysfunction.Results Significant differences were found in multiple variables between the two cohorts,such as operative duration [(115.70 ± 39.69) min in RN vs.(132.26 ± 49.02) min in PN],estimated intraoperative blood loss [(45.85 ± 55.93) days in RN vs.(66.60 ± 61.55) ml in PN],drainage tube removal time [(4.38 ± 1.71) days in RN vs.(4.86 ± 1.61) days in PN],duration of postoperative hospitalization [(5.14 ± 1.65) days in RN vs.(5.52 ± 1.32) days in PN] (P ＜ 0.05).Furthermore,higher proportion of RCC was detected in the RN cohort (93.5％ in RN vs.86.5 ％ in PN,P ＜ 0.05).There was no significant difference in perioperative blood transfusion rate between the two cohorts (10.93％ vs.9.01％,P ＞ 0.05).Compared with the RN cohort,the PN cohort had higher eGFR immediately after surgery [(74.08 ± 18.31) ml/(min · 1.73m2) vs.(52.58 ± 14.21) ml/(min · 1.73m2)],1 month after surgery [(76.11 ± 18.34) ml/(min · 1.73m2) vs.(53.78 ± 15.03)ml/(min · 1.73m2)] and at the last follow-up [(73.92 ± 18.59) ml/(min · 1.73m2) vs.(52.35 ± 16.13) ml/(min · 1.73m2)] (P ＜ 0.001).Compared with those of the RN cohort,the incidences of eGFR ＜ 45 ml/(min · 1.73m2) of the PN cohort were lower immediately after surgery [9.01％ (20/222) vs.31.9％ (79/247)],1 month after surgery [7.87％ (14/178) vs.27.31％ (62/227)],1 year after surgery [8.96％ (13/145) vs.38.75％ (62/16 0)],2 years after surgery [9.89％ (9/91) vs.31.57％ (42/133)],3 years after surgery [13.21％ (7/53) vs.30.61％ (30/98)],4 years after surgery [16.21％ (6/37) vs.30.26％ (23/76)] and 5 years after surgery [18.18％ (4/22) vs.31.11％ (14/45)] (P ＜ 0.001).Conclusion The perioperative risk of PN in the treatment of elderly patients aged 65 and above with clinical cT1-2 renal tumor is controllable.PN could better retain renal function for those patients and reduce the risk of postoperative chronic renal insufficiency.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of selective artery (SAC) with main artery (MAC) clamping of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with early-stage (cTiN0M0) renal masses.Methods Between October 2016 and September 2018,a total of 343 cT1 renal mass patients receiving RPN with SAC (n =21) or MAC (n =322) in our center,were retrospectively analyzed.There were 13 males and 8 females in SAC group with a mean age of (53.1 ± 10.6) years old,mean tumor size of (2.5 ±0.7)cm,and mean R.E.N.A.L.score of 6.2 ± 1.5.There were 149 males and 173 females in MAC group,with a mean age of (51.6 ± 12.3) years old,mean tumor size of(3.5 ± 1.4)cm,and mean R.E.N.A.L.score of 7.9 ± 1.6.There was statistical significance between two groups in tumor size and R.E.N.A.L score(P ＜ 0.001).The group covariates were balanced through propensity score matching (PSM) using 1:2 nearest neighbor matching method.After matching,mean age,tumor size,R.E.N.A.L.score and preoperative eGFR in the SAC and MAC groups were (3.1 ± 10.6) vs.(52.7 ± 10.2) years,(2.5 ± 0.7) vs.(2.6±0.7) cm,6.2 ±1.5 vs.6.2 ±0.9,and (101.7 ± 19.8)vs.(101.6 ±20.3) ml/(min · 1.73m2),respectively (P ＞ 0.05).Perioperative outcomes and follow-up data were compared between the two matched groups.Results There was no significant differences resulted regarding operating time [(127.0 ±54.8)min vs.(130.0 ±49.9) min],blood loss[(166.0 ± 173.5)ml vs.(124.0 ± 101.0)ml],ischemia time [(18.9 ± 6.4) vs.(18.1 ± 5.8) min],hospital stay [(8.7 ± 3.4) d vs.(8.5 ± 2.5) d],incidences of complications (28.6％ vs.19.0％),surgical conversions (0 vs.2.4％),transfusions (4.8％ vs.2.4％) or positive surgical margin(0 vs.0) and malignant pathological outcomes(95.2％ vs.92.9％).The follow-up durations ranged from 3 to 24 months with a mean duration of 9.1 and 12.4 months in SAC and MAC,respectively.At the end of follow-up,the two groups had similar decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate [(7.5 ± 17.2) ％ vs.(12.1 ± 18.2) ％,P =0.466],but the difference was statistically significant with ECT-GFR both of function reduction in the operated kidney [(21.6 ± 14.6) ％ vs.(38.4 ± 20.7)％,P =0.001] and in two kidneys [(2.5 ±16.4)％ vs.(14.8 ±20.0)％,P =0.002].Conclusions Robotic partial nephrectomy with selective vascular control lead to better postoperative renal function compared with main vascular clamped PN techniques and does not lead to a higher surgical risk following a strict patient selection criteria.
ABSTRACT
Objective This study is to investigate the safety,feasibility and efficacy of the complete retroperitoneal robotic nephroureterectomy in treatment of upper urinary tract tumors.Methods Three patients underwent complete retroperitoneal robotic nephroureterectomy due to the upper urinary epithelial tumor from August to October in 2017 in our institution.The 3 patients' demographics and tumor characteristics,including age,gender,body mass index (kg/m2),ASA score,Charlson comorbidity index,tumor laterality and diameter (cm),were 48/75/68 years old,male/female/female,22.9/20.8/21.3,2/2/2,0/2/1,left/right/left,3.2/2.0/1.4,respectively.All patients had complained about the hematuria and accepted the abdominal CT and CTU examination,preoperatively.All patients were diagnosed localized upper urinary tract malignant tumors based on these images.The tumor of case 1 located in the renal pelvis.The tumor of case 2 located in the upper segment of the ureter.The tumor of case 3 located in the lower segment of the ureter.The operations were performed under general anesthesia,and patients were positioned in full flank.A total of five ports were used in the procedure and placed in the following order.The initial port (Port 1) was a robotic camera port,which was placed 3 cm above the intersection of the mid axillary line and the iliac crest.The next three ports (Port 2 to Port 4) were all 8 mm robotic instrument ports and placed at the intersection of posterior axillary line and costal margin,3 cm above the intersection of anterior axillary line and costal margin,and 4 cm medial and inferior to anterior superior iliac spine.The fifth port (Port 5) was a 12 mm assistant port and placed at 3 cm medial and superior to anterior superior iliac spine.Our completely robotic technique did not require patient repositioning and port reassignment,but redocking of the robotic arms was needed.Nephrectomy was performed according to the routine retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure.Once the remainder of the kidney was mobilized,the dissection was directed down the pelvis to mobilize the distal segment of the ureter.The bladder defect was then closed by Endo-GIA stapler or absorbable sutures.Results All procedures were successful and smooth,with no intraoperative or postoperative complications.Operative duration (min) and estimated blood loss (ml) was 245/270/239,100/100/100,respectively.Postoperative pain measured by the visual analog pain scale(VASP) at day 1,day 2,day 3 was 5/4/4,4/3/3,2/2/1,respectively.Time off oral intake (d),duration of drainage (d),active time post-operation (h) and hospital stay (d) was 2/2/2,3/2/3,24/32/32,3/2/4,respectively.Intravesical chemotherapy was performed within 24 h after the operation.Postoperatively,the urinary catheter was left in place for 2 weeks.Pathological examination confirmed papillary urothelial carcinoma in all cases.Conclusions The initial experience shows that the complete retroperitoneal robotic nephroureterectomy is a safe,feasible and efficacious procedure,but in this early stage the clinical indications should be strictly controlled.